APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – BODY CORPORATE DISPUTES – whether adjudicator failed to properly investigate application – whether denial of natural justice –
whether error of law in finding improvements made to Lot 8 by owners in previous five years in absence of probative evidence – whether error of law in finding lower patio exclusively occupied by Lot 8 owners – whether error in finding disposition of common property – whether error of law in finding upper deck encroached on common property airspace – whether error of law in finding body corporate had not previously approved the alleged encroachments – whether order to remove patio and upper deck oppressive and not ‘just and equitable’ – where appellants applied to rely on fresh evidence – whether leave to rely on the fresh evidence should be granted Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld), s 154, s 243, s 261, s 269, s 271 Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard
Module) Regulation 2008, s 184, s 187 Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 146 Ainsworth v Albrecht (2016) 261 CLR 167 Hablethwaite v Andrijevic [2005] QCA 336 Katsikalis v Body Corporate for “The Centre” [2009] QCA 77 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Thompson v Body Corporate for Aspect Caloundra CTS 35499 [2013] QCATA 121 Walden v Body Corporate for Broadwater Tower [2015] QCATA 166
Tume & anor v Body Corporate for Malibu CTS 22174 [2023] QCATA 101 (11 August 2023)